This year’s antibiotic campaign starts on Monday 7 October 2019.
Things to do:
Add messages and resources to your practice or pharmacy website and Twitter account.
Tweet Antibiotic Guardian messages #AntibioticGuardian
Become an Antibiotic Guardian each year. Print and display your certificate.
Send pictures of your antibiotic campaign display to Antibiotic Guardian Chair, Dr Diane Ashiru-Oredope: email@example.com
National posters and leaflets are available from Public Health England via their resource centre
Tweet at #KeepAntibioticsWorking
Add a banner to your e-mail signature:
Right click your chosen image and copy. In ‘Outlook’, open signature
(file, options, mail, compose messages, create or modify signatures, e-mail signature tab).
Paste the image into the dialogue box. Re-size as necessary.
Videos for patient waiting areas
See ‘National Digital Screens’
Our top tips for primary care
For primary care prescribers
A GP guide to antimicrobial resistance YouTube video
For secondary care prescribers
Antimicrobial resistance from Royal College of Nursing
Poster for nurses in hospitals and other healthcare settings
Posters for nurses and midwives to display from PHE
TARGET leaflets and forms
A range of leaflets for patients is available from the Royal College of General Practitioners TARGET Antibiotics Toolkit page.
One can be used during consultations with women who are experiencing non-complicated urinary tract infections, when the clinician feels that the patient does not require an antibiotic prescription:
TARGET urinary tract infection information leaflet v19
The leaflet is available in different languages from the TARGET website
PHE flowchart for men and women over 65 years with suspected UTI
PHE flowchart for infants/children under 16 with suspected UTI
PHE flowchart for women under 65 years with suspected UTI
For care home staff
Form to complete and fax to GP if an older resident has a suspected urinary tract infection:
Management of UTIs in nursing homes form – Form currently under review (awaiting national guidance)
This toolkit provides a set of resources to help promote the most appropriate use of antibiotics in dental care.
Poster to display from PHE.
Self-audit tool from FGDP(UK) and BDA.
The North West Medicines Information Centre runs the National Dental Medicines Information Service (NWMIC). This is available Monday to Friday 08.30 to 17.00 by phone on 0151 794 8113 or firstname.lastname@example.org
For pharmacists and pharmacy technicians
Royal Pharmaceutical Society resources, including the pharmacy contribution to antimicrobial stewardship.
For hospital pharmacists and laboratory staff
For schools and other childcare facilities
A practical guide for staff on managing cases of infectious diseases in schools and other childcare settings.
Out of hospital management of UTIs in elderly patients.
Keep antibiotics working
When it comes to antibiotics take your doctor’s advice
Catch – film about a fictional father and daughter in a future world when antibiotics are useless
True Life Stories: From Patients to Doctors
A survey by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society has found that 84% of British adults don’t wash their hands for long enough. A guide on how to wash hands is available from their website.
Some headlines from NICE
NICE recommends that people should be given supporting information about antibiotic strategies, infection severity and usual duration (KTT9).
Do not issue repeat prescriptions for antimicrobials unless patient has a particular clinical need. Avoid issuing repeat prescriptions for longer than 6 months without review. Monitor patients to reduce risk of side effects and check if antimicrobial is still needed (NG15).
Self-care includes resting, drinking plenty of fluids and taking over-the-counter preparations for symptom relief if necessary. Promote community pharmacies as easily accessible places to obtain advice on managing self-limiting infections. Give people information on the importance of hand-washing (NG63).
Antimicrobial use in UK long-term care facilities: results of a point prevalence survey
A point prevalence survey was conducted by 57 community pharmacists when they carried out visits to care homes across the UK (2017). Anonymized data were recorded for the 17,909 residents. The mean proportion of residents on antibiotics on the day of the visit was 6.3% in England. The percentage of antibiotics prescribed for prophylactic use was 25.3%. Antibiotic-related training was reported as being available for staff in 6.8% of the homes. The pharmacists intervened for clinical or administration reasons. The authors note that there are opportunities for community pharmacy teams to improve antimicrobial stewardship in these settings, including workforce education.
Delaying or withholding antibiotics in older adults with UTIs was associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infection and all-cause mortality according to a study in The BMJ.
UK GP data (2007 to 2015) on 157,264 adults aged 65 years and over who experienced a total of 312,896 UTI episodes was studied. 7.2% of patients were not treated with antibiotics and 6.2% received a delayed antibiotic prescription within 7 days of diagnosis.
Compared with receiving immediate antibiotics, the risk of bloodstream infection within 60 days was raised eight-fold with no antibiotics and seven-fold with delayed antibiotics. The risk of all-cause mortality was also significantly increased by 118% and 16%, respectively.
The authors said that their results suggested that delaying or withholding antibiotics may not be an appropriate strategy in this age group.
BMJ article about what works and what doesn’t.
A case series review of patients aged ≥70 years admitted to 2 NHS hospitals in England looked at records from 312 patients. Of 298 complete patient records, 54% had at least 1 urine dipstick test recorded. 13% of patients who received a urine dipstick test were diagnosed as having a UTI, only 2 out of these 21 cases had >2 clinical signs and symptoms. 60 patients received a second dipstick test, leading to 13 additional cases of UTI diagnosis. Dipstick tests were more likely to be performed on patients with a history of falls (odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.21, 3.07, p < 0.01), and less likely on those with dementia (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.87, p < 0.05).
79 UK general practices were included in this trial (582,675 patient years). Practices were randomised to an antimicrobial stewardship intervention or usual care. Decision support tools were put into practice software to provide patient information sheets. Each practice identified a GP as a champion. The primary outcome was the rate of antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTIs)/1,000 patient years over the 12 month intervention.
The adjusted rate ratio for antibiotic prescribing for RTI was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.99, P=0.04). Adjustment were made for covariates including age and comorbidities. Safety outcomes included the number of serious bacterial complications. The authors saw no evidence to suggest that bacterial infections were more frequent in the antimicrobial stewardship arm. A linked editorial notes that the trail only used practice level prescribing data. Providing clinician level data would have been preferable. Feedback is important, including comparing with peers.
An English prospective cohort study looked at 8,320 children presenting in primary care with acute cough/other respiratory symptoms. A secondary analysis shows modelling used to estimate the effect of antibiotic prescribing on adverse outcomes within 30 days (subsequent hospitalisations and re-consultation for deterioration), 65 (0.8%) children were hospitalised and 350 (4%) re-consulted for deterioration. Immediate and delayed antibiotics were prescribed to 2,313 (28%) and 771 (9%), respectively. Compared with no antibiotics, there was no clear evidence that antibiotics reduced hospitalisations (immediate antibiotic RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.45; delayed RR 0.70, 95%CI 0.26 to 1.90, overall P=0.44). There was evidence that delayed antibiotics reduced re-consultations for deterioration (immediate RR 0.82, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.07; delayed RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.88, overall P = 0.024).
A cohort study in Birmingham assessed records of 943 patients who attended the emergency department with a suspected UTI. 191 were diagnosed with lower UTI, 56 with pyelonephritis and 42 with urosepsis.
91% of patients with lower UTIs received antibiotics. However, clinical and microbiological evidence of UTI was lacking in 64% of cases. Most patients with pyelonephritis and urosepsis received antibiotics, but clinical evidence was lacking in 61% and 74% of cases, respectively.
This study used primary care data from 2013-2015. The most common reasons for antibiotics being prescribed were acute cough and bronchitis, acute sore throat, AOM and acute sinusitis. Antibiotic treatments for upper respiratory tract indications and acute cough and bronchitis accounted for > 2/3 of the total prescriptions considered, and 80% or more of these treatment courses exceeded guideline recommendations. The median number of days beyond the guideline recommendation was 2 (5th-95th centile 2-3 days) for acute cough and bronchitis, 2 (2-8) days for acute otitis media, and 3 (1-7) days for acute sinusitis.
This is a paper from JAMA regarding training clinicians to include the four moments of antibiotic decision making into the thought process when prescribing antibiotics. This is a structured approach to improving antibiotic prescribing in hospitals
Moment 1 asks: “Does this patient have an infection that requires antibiotics?”
Moment 2 asks: “Have I ordered appropriate cultures before starting antibiotics?
Moment 3 asks: “A day or more has passed. Can I stop antibiotics? Can I narrow therapy? Can I change from intravenous to oral therapy?”
Moment 4 asks: “What duration of antibiotic therapy is needed for this patient’s diagnosis?”
The Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin notes that there is a perception of greater potency of IV antibiotics which may prevent prompt switching to the oral route. There is need to balance actual benefit of the IV route against the known risks. Hospital antimicrobial policies should include a recommendation that IV antibiotics are targeted at patients who are severely ill, unable to tolerate oral treatment, or where oral therapy would not provide adequate coverage or tissue penetration. Clinicians are encouraged to review antibiotic use after 48 hours and to consider switching from IV to oral as soon as possible.
Data from electronic health records of 8,192 adult patients in general practices in Holland were used to assess illness episodes for acute cough, acute rhinosinusitis and urinary tract infection. In practices where more shared decision making took place, GPs prescribed fewer antibiotics for patients < 40 years in situations where antibiotics could be considered according to clinical guidelines.
Compared with immediate antibiotics, delayed antibiotics for people with respiratory infection led to a decrease in antibiotic use (on average, 348 vs 930 per 1,000 people). There were no apparent differences between groups in cough, patient satisfaction, or rates of re‐consultation. Compared with no antibiotic, delayed antibiotic resulted in an increase in antibiotic use (on average, 287 vs 137 per 1000 people). However, more people were satisfied with delayed antibiotic (on average, 875 vs 824 per 100 people). Results show no apparent differences between groups in pain, fever, or antibiotic‐related adverse events.
A review found that antimicrobial stewardship programmes alone may reduce overall antibiotic resistance by 19% (incidence ratio [IR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.97). Combining stewardship programmes with procedures for controlling infection appears to reduce antibiotic resistance by 31% (IR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.88). Combining stewardship programmes with hand-hygiene appears to be the most effective combination, reducing antibiotic resistance by 66% (IR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.54). These programmes also reduced the incidence of multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli.
A systematic review (53 studies with more than 1,200 primary care participants) looked at interventions around antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. Primary care professionals were most likely to accept interventions that they perceived as supportive: those that supported clinical decision making and enhanced their interactions with patients. Interventions were viewed in different ways by different sorts of health care professionals.
A UK general practice cohort study looked at lower respiratory tract infection in 28,883 patients aged 16 and over. 104 (0.4%) were referred to hospital for radiographic investigation or admission, or both on the day of the index consultation, or were admitted with cancer. Of the remaining 28 779, subsequent hospital admission or death occurred in 26/7332 (0.3%) after no antibiotic prescription: 156/17 628 (0.9%) after prescription for immediate antibiotics; and 14/3819 (0.4%) after a prescription for delayed antibiotics. Analysis found no reduction in hospital admission and death after immediate antibiotics and a non-significant reduction with delayed antibiotics. Re-consultation for new, worsening, or non-resolving symptoms was common (1443/7332 (19.7%), 4455/17 628 (25.3%), and 538/3819 (14.1%), respectively) and was significantly reduced by delayed antibiotics but not by immediate antibiotics. The authors concluded that if clinicians are considering antibiotics, a delayed prescription may be preferable to an immediate prescription.
An accompanying editorial notes:
“The most important findings were that serious adverse events such as death or hospital admission are rare in people with acute cough and that an immediate antibiotic prescription is not associated with a significantly reduced risk.
This study adds to others showing that not offering an immediate prescription for antibiotics to people with common uncomplicated acute respiratory infections is a low risk strategy”
Some national learning resources
WHO Antimicrobial Stewardship: a competency based approach.
Health Education England e-learning on antimicrobial resistance.
Target training resources. These include antibiotic resistance, urinary tract infections, sexual health, skin.
Online courses at Future Learn. These include ones about antimicrobial resistance.
Education and training section in Antimicrobial Resistance Resource Handbook. These include infection control and antimicrobial stewardship.
NECS e-learning: antibiotic prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship in primary care.
For the pharmacy workforce (CPPE). These include antibacterial resistance, antibacterials.
e-Bug has learning resources for children and young people.
TED-Ed – What causes antibiotic resistance?
The new plan includes a strong focus on infection prevention and control and a target to reduce UK antimicrobial use in humans by 15% by 2024.
House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee – new report on antibiotic resistance highlights that prevention is key – including vaccination, cleanliness and reducing antibiotic usage.
British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy includes an e-book: Antimicrobial stewardship: from principles to practice
PHE Antimicrobial Resistance AMR Toolkit for Public Engagement April 2017
AWaRe is a useful tool to reduce antimicrobial resistance and ensure access
Some data on antibiotic usage
Quality premium antibiotic dashboard
ESPAUR report – English surveillance. 2018 report now available.
Fingertips – AMR local indicators
PrescQIPP – see section on antimicrobial stewardship in the Data Hub
WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption 2016-18
European Antibiotic Awareness Day: 18 November
WHO World Antibiotic Awareness Week 12 – 18 November. The messages are:
Think twice. Seek Advice.
Misuse of Antibiotics puts us all at Risk.